Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Prime Money Path
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 00:13:01
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (38937)
Related
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Mitt Romney’s Senate exit may create a vacuum of vocal, conservative Trump critics
- 'Yellowstone' Season 5, Part 2: Here's when the final episode comes out and how to watch
- San Diego raises bar to work with immigration officials ahead of Trump’s deportation efforts
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Arctic Tundra Shifts to Source of Climate Pollution, According to New Report Card
- Morgan Wallen sentenced after pleading guilty in Nashville chair
- Gas prices set to hit the lowest they've been since 2021, AAA says
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Ohio Supreme Court sides with pharmacies in appeal of $650 million opioid judgment
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- US inflation likely edged up last month, though not enough to deter another Fed rate cut
- 'The Later Daters': Cast, how to stream new Michelle Obama
- Philippines' VP Sara Duterte a no
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- How to watch the Geminid meteor shower this weekend
- KISS OF LIFE reflects on sold
- Morgan Wallen's Chair Throwing Case Heading to Criminal Court
Recommendation
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
Fortnite OG is back. Here's what to know about the mode's release, maps and game pass.
Woman fired from Little India massage parlour arrested for smashing store's glass door
How Hailee Steinfeld and Josh Allen Navigate Their Private Romance on Their Turf
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
PACCAR recalls over 220,000 trucks for safety system issue: See affected models
Dick Van Dyke credits neighbors with saving his life and home during Malibu fire
Biden says he was ‘stupid’ not to put his name on pandemic relief checks like Trump did